Human Gist Processing Augments Deep Learning Breast Cancer Risk Assessment


Convolutional neural network (CNN) models may benefit from the ability of radiology experts to extract the "gist" of abnormality from mammograms. Prior research has demonstrated that radiologists can classify a mammogram as normal or abnormal at better than chance levels after less than a second's exposure to the image. In this work, we combine radiologist gist inputs into pre-trained machine learning models to validate that integrating human gist perception with a CNN model can achieve an AUC (area under the curve) of up to 0.899 – statistically significantly higher than either the gist perception of radiologists or the model without gist input.

Our Approach


Responsive image


Baselines:


Responsive image

Paper


Human Gist Processing Augments Deep Learning Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Skylar W. Wurster, Arkadiusz Sitek, Jian Chen, Karla Evans, Gaeun Kim, and Jeremy Wolfe

Comming soon


Source Code


Available on GitHub here


References


[1] Yala, A., Lehman, C., Schuster, T., Portnoi, T. & Barzilay, R. A deep learning mammography-based model for improved breast cancer risk prediction. Radiology 182716, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182716 (2019).
[2] Sitek, A. & Wolfe, J. M. Assessing cancer risk from mammograms: Deep learning is superior to conventional risk models. Radiology 292, 67–68, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190791 (2019).
[3] Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Prog. brain research 155, 23–36, DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55002-2 (2006).
[4] Evans, K. K., Georgian-Smith, D., Tambouret, R., Birdwell, R. L. & Wolfe, J. M. The gist of the abnormal: Above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye. Psychon. bulletin & review 20, 1170–1175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0459-3 (2013).
[5] Evans, K. K., Haygood, T. M., Cooper, J., Culpan, A.-M. & Wolfe, J. M. A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 10292–10297, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.160618711310.1073/pnas.1606187113 (2016).
[6] Evans, K. K., Culpan, A.-M. & Wolfe, J. M. Detecting the “gist” of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible. The Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20190136, DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190136 (2019).
[7] Brennan, P. C. et al. Radiologists can detect the ‘gist’ of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appear. Sci. Reports 8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26100-5 (2018).
[8] Deng, J. et al. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 248–255, DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 (2009).
[9] Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 3149–3157 http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6907-lightgbm-a-highly-efficient-gradient-boosting-decision-tree.pdf (2017).
[10] Akselrod-Ballin, A. et al. Predicting breast cancer by applying deep learning to linked health records and mammograms. Radiology 292, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182622 (2019).
[11] Rampun, A., Morrow, P. J., Scotney, B. W. & Winder, J. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms. Artif. Intell. Medicine 79, 28–41, DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.06.001 (2017).

Researchers




Skylar W. Wurster


Arkadiusz Sitek


Gaeun Kim